Court-approved attorney hourly rates: District of Columbia | LegalTime AI

Court-approved attorney hourly rates: District Court, District of Columbia

60 approved rates from 15 fee rulings since October 20, 2024. Latest ruling Oct 1, 2026. Data as of October 20, 2026.

RoleMedianMiddle halfRangeRates
Partner $1,057 $490 to $1,375 6
Associate $538 $290 to $785 7
Attorney $402 $363 to $558 $315 to $838 34
Paralegal $210 $160 to $239 6
Law clerk $186 $100 to $236 6

Approved rates by year

YearPartnerAssociateParalegal
2025 $538 (5)$236 (5)

Median approved rate by the year of the ruling (number of rates in brackets). A year shows a median at 5 or more rates. Not adjusted for inflation.

Attorney rates by years of experience

ExperienceMedianMiddle halfRates
20+ years$3757

Only rates where the opinion states the attorney's years of experience.

The court approved a lower rate than requested for 0 of 59 timekeepers (0%).

Cite these rates

$1,057/hr

In District of Columbia fee rulings since October 20, 2024, the median court-approved partner rate was $1,057 an hour (6 rates).

Based on 6 rates. Rates approved in District of Columbia fee rulings since October 20, 2024, checked against each opinion. Statutory rates are left out.

$538/hr

In District of Columbia fee rulings since October 20, 2024, the median court-approved associate rate was $538 an hour (7 rates).

Based on 7 rates. Rates approved in District of Columbia fee rulings since October 20, 2024, checked against each opinion. Statutory rates are left out.

$402/hr

In District of Columbia fee rulings since October 20, 2024, the median court-approved attorney rate was $402 an hour (34 rates).

Based on 34 rates. Rates approved in District of Columbia fee rulings since October 20, 2024, checked against each opinion. Statutory rates are left out.

$210/hr

In District of Columbia fee rulings since October 20, 2024, the median court-approved paralegal rate was $210 an hour (6 rates).

Based on 6 rates. Rates approved in District of Columbia fee rulings since October 20, 2024, checked against each opinion. Statutory rates are left out.

$186/hr

In District of Columbia fee rulings since October 20, 2024, the median court-approved law clerk rate was $186 an hour (6 rates).

Based on 6 rates. Rates approved in District of Columbia fee rulings since October 20, 2024, checked against each opinion. Statutory rates are left out.

Copy these rulings as citations

Recent District of Columbia rulings with the rates they approved, formatted for a fee petition. Check each ruling before citing it.

Ezekwesili v. Proctor, No. Civil Action No. 2024-2132 (D.D.C. Oct. 1, 2026) (approving hourly rates of $375 for an attorney with 47 years' experience); EZEKWESILI v. PROCTOR, No. 1:24-cv-02132 (D.D.C. Oct. 1, 2026) (approving hourly rates of $375 for attorneys with 47 years' experience); BLAYLOCK v. STARKE, No. 1:23-cv-03606 (D.D.C. Aug. 19, 2026) (approving hourly rates of $1,355 to $1,375 for partners with 30 years' experience; $785 for an associate with 2 years' experience); TEAMSTERS LOCAL 639-EMPLOYERS HEALTH TRUST FUND v. COUPLIN, No. 1:25-cv-01835 (D.D.C. Aug. 6, 2026) (approving hourly rates of $336 for an associate; $183 for a paralegal; $100 for a law clerk); HILADO v. MEDSTAR GEORGETOWN MEDICAL CENTER, INC., No. 1:24-cv-00007 (D.D.C. Mar. 5, 2026) (approving hourly rates of $745 for an attorney with 37 years' experience; $675 for an attorney with 14 years' experience); I.A.M. NATIONAL PENSION FUND v. KM ENTERTAINMENT CONSULTANTS, No. 1:25-cv-00146 (D.D.C. Nov. 14, 2025) (approving hourly rates of $538 for an attorney); SARGENT v. DEPARTMENT OF STATE, No. 1:19-cv-00620 (D.D.C. Sept. 12, 2025) (approving hourly rates of $490 for a partner; $290 for an associate; $165 for a law clerk); AMERICAN WILD HORSE CAMPAIGN v. BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, No. 1:22-cv-02972 (D.D.C. July 25, 2025) (approving hourly rates of $538 for an attorney); CABRERA v. MOGOO, INC., No. 1:22-cv-01816 (D.D.C. July 2, 2025) (approving hourly rates of $1,057 for a partner; $538 to $777 for associates; $239 for a paralegal); INOVA HEALTH CARE SERVICES, FOR INOVA FAIRFAX HOSPITAL AND ITS DEPARTMENT, LIFE WITH CANCER v. OMNI SHOREHAM CORPORATION, No. 1:20-cv-00784 (D.D.C. June 15, 2025) (approving hourly rates of $625 for a partner); CABRERA v. MOGOO, INC., No. 1:22-cv-01816 (D.D.C. May 8, 2025) (approving hourly rates of $1,057 for a partner; $538 to $777 for associates; $239 for a paralegal); CALLIHAM v. PREVENTIVE MEASURES OF WASHINGTON, DC, LLC, No. 1:23-cv-00638 (D.D.C. Mar. 14, 2025) (approving hourly rates of $500 to $838 for attorneys; $236 for a paralegal).

Rulings

Rates turn on experience, practice area, and the work done. Use these as a starting point and cite the rulings, not this page, in a fee petition.

  • Rivas v. United American Security, LLC

    Oct 19, 2026 · Wage and hour · Statutory rate, not in medians

    RoleExperienceRequestedApproved
    Attorney $1,100 $1,100
    Paralegal $299 $299
    The court's words
    The Plaintiffs therefore requested $1,100 per hour consistent with the 2026–2027 LSI Laffey Matrix rate for attorneys with 11–19 years’ experience at the time of filing.
    In addition, the Plaintiffs requested $299 per hour for their counsel’s legal assistants and paralegals, consistent with the same updated matrix.
  • Ezekwesili v. Proctor

    Oct 1, 2026 · Commercial

    RoleExperienceRequestedApproved
    Attorney 47 years $375 $375
    The court's words
    the Plaintiff seeks attorney fees for "three (3) hours of [her] attorney's time" on the trial date of May 18, 2026, "at the hourly rate . . . of $375," for a total of $1,125.00.
  • EZEKWESILI v. PROCTOR et al

    Oct 1, 2026 · Commercial · Rates from a fee matrix

    RoleExperienceRequestedApproved
    Attorney 47 years $375 $375
    Attorney 47 years $375 $375
    The court's words
    the Plaintiff seeks attorney fees for "three (3) hours of [her] attorney's time" on the trial date of May 18, 2026, "at the hourly rate . . . of $375," for a total of $1,125.00.
    the Court finds that five hours of attorney fees at the previously established rate of $375 per hour represent the reasonable expenses incurred for the prosecution of the Plaintiff's motion
  • BLAYLOCK v. STARKE et al

    Aug 19, 2026 · Other

    RoleExperienceRequestedApproved
    Partner 30 years $1,375 $1,375
    Partner 30 years $1,355 $1,355
    Associate 2 years $785 $785
    The court's words
    Jessie F. Beeber ($1,375 per hour) is a partner and chair of the firm’s New York commercial litigation group with nearly 30 years of experience
    William J. Briggs, II ($1,355 per hour) is a Los Angeles partner who has spent more than 30 years litigating
    Sarika Andavolu ($785 per hour) is a second-year associate in Venable’s New York commercial litigation practice.
  • TEAMSTERS LOCAL 639-EMPLOYERS HEALTH TRUST FUND et al v. COUPLIN

    Aug 6, 2026 · ERISA benefits

    RoleExperienceRequestedApproved
    Associate $336 $336
    Paralegal $183 $183
    Law clerk $100 $100
    The court's words
    16.8 hours of professional services rendered by Mooney Green associates at a rate of $336 per hour
    7.6 hours of paralegal work at $183 per hour
    7.1 hours of work by law clerks at $100 per hour
  • HILADO v. MEDSTAR GEORGETOWN MEDICAL CENTER, INC.

    Mar 5, 2026 · Employment · Rates from a fee matrix

    RoleExperienceRequestedApproved
    Attorney 37 years $745 $745
    Attorney 14 years $675 $675
    The court's words
    Hilado proposes an hourly rate of $745 for Stephen Swift and $675 for Charity Swift, which are lower than those in the rate table.
    Hilado proposes an hourly rate of $745 for Stephen Swift and $675 for Charity Swift, which are lower than those in the rate table.
  • I.A.M. NATIONAL PENSION FUND et al v. KM ENTERTAINMENT CONSULTANTS

    Nov 14, 2025 · ERISA benefits · Rates from a fee matrix

    RoleExperienceRequestedApproved
    Attorney $538 $538
    The court's words
    I.A.M. has provided documentation reflecting 4.6 hours of work by its attorney, billed at a rate of $538 per hour.
  • SARGENT v. DEPARTMENT OF STATE et al

    Sep 12, 2025 · Employment · Fee cut details

    RoleExperienceRequestedApproved
    Partner $490 $490
    Associate $290 $290
    Law clerk $165 $165
    The court's words
    Counsel’s hourly rate was $490 for partners; $290 for associates; and $165 for law clerks.
    Counsel’s hourly rate was $490 for partners; $290 for associates; and $165 for law clerks.
    Counsel’s hourly rate was $490 for partners; $290 for associates; and $165 for law clerks.
  • AMERICAN WILD HORSE CAMPAIGN v. BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT

    Jul 25, 2025 · FOIA · Rates from a fee matrix

    RoleExperienceRequestedApproved
    Attorney $538 $538
    The court's words
    it is appropriate to reduce Plaintiff’s award to approximately seven attorney hours using a rate of $538 per hour (the rate of Thomas Herbert Housel, the primary timekeeper), which equals $3,766.00.
  • CABRERA v. MOGOO, INC. et al

    Jul 2, 2025 · Wage and hour · Rates from a fee matrix

    RoleExperienceRequestedApproved
    Partner $1,057 $1,057
    Associate $777 $777
    Associate $538 $538
    Paralegal $239 $239
    The court's words
    the Court finds the hourly rates requested by Cabrera’s counsel to be reasonable and appropriate, specifically (see Pl.’s Mem. at 8): $1,057 for both Omar Melehy and Suvita Melehy
    $777 for Andrew Balashov, $538 for Alexandre Todorov, and $239 for the firm’s paralegals.
    $777 for Andrew Balashov, $538 for Alexandre Todorov, and $239 for the firm’s paralegals.
    $777 for Andrew Balashov, $538 for Alexandre Todorov, and $239 for the firm’s paralegals.
  • INOVA HEALTH CARE SERVICES, FOR INOVA FAIRFAX HOSPITAL AND ITS DEPARTMENT, LIFE WITH CANCER et al v. OMNI SHOREHAM CORPORATION et al

    Jun 15, 2025 · Commercial · Rates from a fee matrix · Fee cut details

    RoleExperienceRequestedApproved
    Partner $625
    The court's words
    partners (and Mahoney specifically) did virtually all the work in this litigation and billed the same $625+ hourly rates regardless of the skill the task required.
  • CABRERA v. MOGOO, INC. et al

    May 8, 2025 · Wage and hour · Rates from a fee matrix

    RoleExperienceRequestedApproved
    Partner $1,057 $1,057
    Associate $777 $777
    Associate $538 $538
    Paralegal $239 $239
    The court's words
    $1,057 for both Omar Melehy and Suvita Melehy
    $777 for Andrew Balashov
    $538 for Alexandre Todorov
    $239 for the firm’s paralegals
  • CALLIHAM v. PREVENTIVE MEASURES OF WASHINGTON, DC, LLC et al

    Mar 14, 2025 · Other · Rates from a fee matrix

    RoleExperienceRequestedApproved
    Attorney $500 $500
    Attorney $838 $838
    Paralegal $236 $236
    The court's words
    the requested hourly rates—which range from $500 to $838 per hour depending on the lawyer, as well as $236 per hour for paralegals—are right in line with the Fitzpatrick Matrix.
    the requested hourly rates—which range from $500 to $838 per hour depending on the lawyer, as well as $236 per hour for paralegals—are right in line with the Fitzpatrick Matrix.
    the requested hourly rates—which range from $500 to $838 per hour depending on the lawyer, as well as $236 per hour for paralegals—are right in line with the Fitzpatrick Matrix.
  • BRICKLAYERS & TROWEL TRADES INTERNATIONAL PENSION FUND v. ATCO MASONRY LLC

    Feb 12, 2025 · ERISA benefits

    RoleExperienceRequestedApproved
    Attorney 40 years $355 $355
    Attorney 8 years $355 $355
    The court's words
    The attorneys who performed work for this case were Charles W. Gilligan, with nearly 40 years of experience, and Daniel Keenan, with eight years of experience. Id. at 38. Both charged Plaintiff a billing rate of $355.00 per hour.
    The attorneys who performed work for this case were Charles W. Gilligan, with nearly 40 years of experience, and Daniel Keenan, with eight years of experience. Id. at 38. Both charged Plaintiff a billing rate of $355.00 per hour.
  • COGDELL v. MURPHY

    Feb 3, 2025 · Civil rights · Rates from a fee matrix

    RoleExperienceRequestedApproved
    Attorney $658 $658
    Attorney $684 $684
    Law clerk $207 $207
    Law clerk $236 $236
    Law clerk $207 $207
    other $189 $189
    Attorney $315 $315
    Attorney $580 $580
    Attorney $499 $499
    Attorney $375 $375
    Attorney $416 $416
    Attorney $538 $564
    Attorney $328 $328
    Attorney $416 $416
    Attorney $331 $331
    Attorney $471 $471
    Attorney $416 $416
    Attorney $387 $387
    Attorney $359 $359
    Attorney $328 $328
    Attorney $359 $359
    Attorney $371 $371
    Attorney $360 $360
    Attorney $374 $374
    Attorney $388 $388
    Law clerk $160 $160
    Paralegal $160 $160
    Paralegal $160 $160
    The court's words
    Attorney Morris Fischer billed 21.3 hours at an hourly rate of $658 in 2019; 44.85 hours at an hourly rate of $693 in 2020; 23.2 hours at an hourly rate of $703 in 2021; 45.6 hours at an hourly rate of $731 in 2022; 34.2 hours at an hourly rate of $782 in 2023; and 16.9 hours at an hourly rate of $843 in 2024.
    Attorney Matthew Fornaro billed 8 hours at an hourly rate of $684 in 2022, resulting in a sum of $5,472.
    Law clerk Mark Dooley billed 5.5 hours at an hourly rate of $207 in 2022, resulting in a sum of $1,138.50.
    Law clerk Nathan Harding billed 6.48 hours at an hourly rate of $236 in 2024, resulting in a sum of $1,529.28.
    Law clerk Benjamin Alpert billed 9 hours at an hourly rate of $207 in 2022 and billed 7.2 hours at an hourly rate of $220 in 2023.
    secretary Gloria Victor-Dorr billed 1.1 hours at an hourly rate of $189 in 2019; billed 3.2 hours at an hourly rate of $199 in 2020; and billed 0.2 hours at an hourly rate of $200 in 2021.
    the Court will apply Shoikhetbrod’s 2015 Fitzpatrick Matrix rate of $315 per hour to all billed hours to calculate his fees.
    the Court will apply Cannon’s 2015 Fitzpatrick Matrix rate of $580 per hour to all billed time to calculate her fees.
    Attorney Graig Zappia billed 0.8 hours at an hourly rate of $499 in 2016, resulting in a sum of $399.20.
    the Court will apply Macomber’s 2015 Fitzpatrick Matrix rate of $375 per hour to all billed time to calculate his fees.
    Attorney Courtney Mickman billed 0.4 hours at an hourly rate of $416 in 2017, resulting in a sum of $166.40.
    Attorney Stephen M. Jewell billed 0.1 hours at an hourly rate of $538 in 2019, resulting in a sum of $53.80.
    Attorney Amelia Nicoletti billed 2.3 hours at an hourly rate of $328 in 2016, resulting in a sum of $754.40.
    Attorney Erik Kraemer billed 17.3 hours at an hourly rate of $416 in 2017, resulting in a sum of $7,196.80.
    Attorney Jennifer Aronson billed 4.8 hours at an hourly rate of $331 in 2015, resulting in a sum of $1,588.80.
    Attorney Joseph Bergh billed 17 hours at an hourly rate of $471 in 2015, resulting in a sum of $8,007.00.
    Attorney Giancarlo Facciponte billed 6.2 hours at an hourly rate of $416 in 2017, resulting in a sum of $2,579.20.
    Attorney Melissa Mummery billed 27 hours at an hourly rate of $387 in 2017, resulting in a sum of $10,449.00.
    Attorney Nicholas Devyatkin billed 10 hours at an hourly rate of $359 in 2016, resulting in a sum of $3,590.00.
    Attorney Nicholas Pederson billed 11 hours at an hourly rate of $328 in 2016, resulting in a sum of $3,608.00.
    Attorney Nicholas Narchus billed 21.4 hours at an hourly rate of $359 in 2016, resulting in a sum of $7,682.60.
    Attorney Patrick Tyler billed 1.6 hours at an hourly rate of $371 in 2017, resulting in a sum of $593.60.
    Attorney Sarah McKinin billed 4 hours at an hourly rate of $360 in 2015, resulting in a sum of $1,440.00.
    the Court will apply Rapp-Tully’s 2016 Fitzpatrick Matrix rate of $374 per hour to all billed time to calculate her fees.
    Attorney Tyler Patterson billed 25.3 hours at an hourly rate of $388 in 2016, resulting in a sum of $9,816.40.
    Law clerk Neelofar Nawab billed 0.5 hours at an hourly rate of $160 in 2016, resulting in a sum of $80.
    the Court will apply O’Leary’s 2016 Fitzpatrick Matrix rate of $160 per hour to all billed time to calculate her fees.
    Paralegal Mary Jane Kemnitz billed 0.5 hours at an hourly rate of $160 in 2016, resulting in a sum of $80.

Earlier rulings

CaseDateApproved rates
VAUGHAN v. CAPITAL CITY PROTECTIVE SERVICES, II LLC Oct 24, 2024 Attorney $800, Attorney $568
SEO et al v. OH et al Oct 3, 2024 Attorney $948, Attorney $948
TRUSTEES OF THE IAM NATIONAL PENSION FUND v. M & K EMPLOYEE SOLUTIONS, LLC et al Sep 30, 2024
SEGAR, et al v. ASHCROFT, et al., Sep 27, 2024 Partner $940
LOUISE TRAUMA CENTER LLC v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Sep 18, 2024 Attorney $807, Attorney $731, Attorney $736, Attorney $760
LOUISE TRAUMA CENTER LLC v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY Jul 1, 2024
CABRERA v. MOGOO, INC. et al Mar 31, 2024 Attorney $508, Paralegal $225
BLACK ROCK CITY LLC v. BERNHARDT et al Mar 28, 2024 Attorney $231
KIGHT et al v. CRUNCHY TOBACCO, INC. Feb 14, 2024 Attorney $250

FAQ

What hourly rate does the District of Columbia approve for partners?

A median of $1,057 an hour across 6 approved rates in fee rulings since October 20, 2024.

What hourly rate does the District of Columbia approve for associates?

A median of $538 an hour across 7 approved rates in fee rulings since October 20, 2024.

What hourly rate does the District of Columbia approve for attorneys?

A median of $402 an hour across 34 approved rates in fee rulings since October 20, 2024, with the middle half from $363 to $558.

How often does the District of Columbia cut a requested hourly rate?

For 0 of 59 timekeepers (0%) in recent fee rulings.

How do I prove a reasonable hourly rate in the District of Columbia?

With evidence beyond your own declaration, usually recent awards in the same district for lawyers of similar experience. The rulings on this page can be cited directly; use the citation block to copy them.

The data is free to use under CC BY 4.0. Please credit "LegalTime Fee Cut Tracker" with a link to this page. Spot an error? Email team@legaltime.ai with the case name and we will correct it. Summaries of public court opinions. Not legal advice.

All districts · Attorney fee motions in District of Columbia federal courts · National rates research