E.D. Kentucky cuts social security fee award 30.4%, including for clerical work
Whitley v. SSA, No. 5:24-cv-00365. District Court, E.D. Kentucky, Judge Gregory F. Van Tatenhove. Decided . Read the opinion
- Requested
- $9,650.01
- Awarded
- $6,719
- Cut
- 30.4%$2,931.01
Social Security · Equal Access to Justice Act · Figures include costs
What happened
The plaintiff in Whitley v. SSA sought $9,650.01 in fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act, including costs, for 53.3 hours. The court awarded $6,719, a reduction of $2,931.01 or 30.4 percent, and 29.2 hours. It cut 22.6 hours by 75.3 percent for duplicative staffing, struck 1.0 hour for preparation of a pro hac vice motion, and disallowed 1.0 hour of clerical work billed as legal work.
What the court said
This is a clerical or secretarial task.
The court also reduced the award for: duplicative staffing, other.
Why it matters
The ruling shows that courts will separate clerical tasks from legal work and reduce fees for entries that do not reflect legal judgment, even in a modest EAJA request, so time records should distinguish the two.
How to keep this out of your fee petition
- Leave purely clerical work off the fee petition.
- Describe paralegal tasks so the substantive work is clear.
- Split mixed entries into their substantive and clerical parts.
Cite this ruling
Whitley v. SSA, No. 5:24-cv-00365 (E.D. Ky. Mar. 30, 2026) attorney fee motions in Kentucky federal courts.
Figures and quotes are taken from the opinion and checked against its text. Spot an error? Email team@legaltime.ai with the case name and we will correct it. Summaries of public court opinions. Not legal advice.
More rulings like this
- D. Massachusetts cuts commercial fee award over clerical work Nichole Sliney Realty Team, Inc. v. Mount Vernon Fire Insurance Company · Oct 16, 2026
- D. Arizona cuts wage and hour fee award, including for clerical work Perez v. Evolet's Painting Service LLC et al · Oct 9, 2026
- D. Arizona cuts intellectual property fee award 11.2%, including for clerical work Davalos et al v. Unknown Party et al · Oct 6, 2026