W.D. Pennsylvania cuts fee award 4.7%, including for clerical work | LegalTime AI

W.D. Pennsylvania cuts fee award 4.7%, including for clerical work

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. BEEGHLY TREE, LLC et al, No. 3:21-cv-00160. District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania, Judge Christy Criswell Wiegand. Decided . Read the opinion

Requested
$116,487.50
Awarded
$111,070
Cut
4.7%$5,417.50

Fee applicant's counsel: Stone Law Firm, LLC

What happened

The relator's counsel, Stone Law Firm, LLC, requested $116,487.50 in fees. The court awarded $111,070, a reduction of $5,417.50 or 4.7%. The court excluded $4,517.50 in time spent on unrelated claims, 0.5 hours billed by Anthony Primelo to set up Microsoft Teams because it is not ordinarily billed to a client, 0.8 hours for waiting on hold for a call that did not occur, and 0.4 hours for a wellness check on the relator.

What the court said

Clerical work billed as legal work
the 0.5 hours billed by Anthony Primelo to set up Microsoft Teams, ECF No. 36-1 at 14 (line 287), is not something that would ordinarily be billed to a client. Accordingly, the Court will exclude it.

The court also reduced the award for: unrelated claims, other, other.

Why it matters

The ruling shows that courts will exclude time entries for tasks not ordinarily billed to a client, such as clerical or administrative work, and will separate time spent on unrelated claims from the fee calculation.

How to keep this out of your fee petition

  • Leave purely clerical work off the fee petition.
  • Describe paralegal tasks so the substantive work is clear.
  • Split mixed entries into their substantive and clerical parts.

Cite this ruling

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. BEEGHLY TREE, LLC, No. 3:21-cv-00160 (W.D. Pa. Sept. 26, 2025)

See hourly rates the W.D. Pennsylvania approves and attorney fee motions in Pennsylvania federal courts.

Figures and quotes are taken from the opinion and checked against its text. Spot an error? Email team@legaltime.ai with the case name and we will correct it. Summaries of public court opinions. Not legal advice.

More rulings like this

All rulings in the Fee Cut Tracker