D. Oregon cuts wage and hour fee award 3.3% over clerical work
Randall v. Im et al, No. 3:23-cv-00243. District Court, D. Oregon, Judge Amy M. Baggio. Decided . Read the opinion
- Requested
- $26,475
- Awarded
- $25,612.50
- Cut
- 3.3%$862.50
Wage and hour
What happened
The fee applicant in Randall v. Im et al asked the District of Oregon for $26,475 in attorney fees for 70.6 hours in a wage and hour case. Judge Amy M. Baggio awarded $25,612.50, a reduction of $862.50 or 3.3%. The court excluded 2.3 hours that had been billed as legal work but were clerical in nature, leaving 68.3 hours. The figures do not include costs.
What the court said
Those billings, totaling 2.3 hours, are excluded.
Why it matters
The order shows that courts will separate clerical tasks from legal work when reviewing time records on a fee petition, and will exclude those hours even when the overall reduction is small. It also shows that a modest cut can rest entirely on how entries describe the work performed.
How to keep this out of your fee petition
- Leave purely clerical work off the fee petition.
- Describe paralegal tasks so the substantive work is clear.
- Split mixed entries into their substantive and clerical parts.
Cite this ruling
Randall v. Im, No. 3:23-cv-00243 (D. Or. Feb. 9, 2026) See hourly rates the D. Oregon approves and attorney fee motions in Oregon federal courts.
Figures and quotes are taken from the opinion and checked against its text. Spot an error? Email team@legaltime.ai with the case name and we will correct it. Summaries of public court opinions. Not legal advice.
More rulings like this
- D. Massachusetts cuts commercial fee award over clerical work Nichole Sliney Realty Team, Inc. v. Mount Vernon Fire Insurance Company · Oct 16, 2026
- D. Arizona cuts wage and hour fee award, including for clerical work Perez v. Evolet's Painting Service LLC et al · Oct 9, 2026
- D. Arizona cuts intellectual property fee award 11.2%, including for clerical work Davalos et al v. Unknown Party et al · Oct 6, 2026