W.D. Arkansas cuts wage and hour fee award 65.9%, including for clerical work
Burris v. Baxter County Regional Hospital, No. 3:23-cv-03008. District Court, W.D. Arkansas, Judge Mark E. Ford. Decided . Read the opinion
- Requested
- $391,000
- Awarded
- $133,208.75
- Cut
- 65.9%$257,791.25
Wage and hour · Fair Labor Standards Act · Fee applicant's counsel: Josephson Dunlap, LLP
What happened
The plaintiff's firm, Josephson Dunlap, LLP, requested $391,000 in fees under the Fair Labor Standards Act. The court awarded $133,208.75, a reduction of $257,791.25 or 65.9%. The court reduced hours for unrelated claims, excessive hours, clerical work billed as legal work, duplicative staffing, block billing, vague entries, and fees on fees, and it lowered the hourly rates. The figures do not include costs.
What the court said
the Court will deduct an additional 3.20 paralegal hours related to these tasks.
the Court will reduce the award by 29.70 hours. Both Schreiber’s and Matthews’ hours will be reduced by 14.85 hours each.
the Court will reduce the award by 29.70 hours. Both Schreiber’s and Matthews’ hours will be reduced by 14.85 hours each.
The court also reduced the award for: unrelated claims, excessive hours, other, excessive hours, excessive hours, duplicative staffing, fees on fees, excessive hours, hourly rate reduced.
Why it matters
The ruling shows that courts will reduce fee awards when time records contain block billing, vague entries, and clerical tasks billed as legal work, and when staffing is duplicative. It also shows that courts may cut hours for excessive time and adjust hourly rates, so precise and detailed time records matter on a fee petition.
How to keep this out of your fee petition
- Leave purely clerical work off the fee petition.
- Describe paralegal tasks so the substantive work is clear.
- Split mixed entries into their substantive and clerical parts.
Cite this ruling
Burris v. Baxter County Regional Hospital, No. 3:23-cv-03008 (W.D. Ark. Nov. 12, 2025) See hourly rates the W.D. Arkansas approves and attorney fee motions in Arkansas federal courts.
Figures and quotes are taken from the opinion and checked against its text. Spot an error? Email team@legaltime.ai with the case name and we will correct it. Summaries of public court opinions. Not legal advice.
More rulings like this
- D. Massachusetts cuts commercial fee award over clerical work Nichole Sliney Realty Team, Inc. v. Mount Vernon Fire Insurance Company · Oct 16, 2026
- D. Arizona cuts wage and hour fee award, including for clerical work Perez v. Evolet's Painting Service LLC et al · Oct 9, 2026
- D. Arizona cuts intellectual property fee award 11.2%, including for clerical work Davalos et al v. Unknown Party et al · Oct 6, 2026